
Re: Terminators hulking appearance
DN38 wrote:
We still wouldnt know. Did you know which one is a terminator when that group walked in? I bet no one did. We all saw a bunch of men in rags
I kind of figured it out about five seconds in, when the Terminator shoved people out of the way and pulled out a gun less than two seconds after entering the shot. Because of its actions, it was clearly recognizable as a Terminator even before I got a good look at it. All of its infiltration happened off-screen, so we really only see the Terminator in assault mode. And it is a bit different in T1 since nobody really knew what to expect yet. Nobody thought all Terminator looked like bodybuilders, because nobody had seen Terminators prior to that movie. But if people have their way and all Terminators look like bodybuilders, then that's going to add an element of predictability that wasn't present in the first movie.
Quote:
Yet Reese didnt spot T-800 in TechNoir and Columbu made its way to the base
I'm still talking about the audience. Kyle wasn't part of the audience.
Quote:
Bodybuilders or not we couldnt tell. Check Columbu for example. I dont care one way or another but if we were never showed a normally sized man as a terminator then I believe in Skynet's by-the-anatomy-book thinking
If we can't tell they're bodybuilders, then I see no need to specifically cast bodybuilders. And Skynet wasn't going with by-the anatomy-book thinking, because a bodybuilder physique is rather unnatural. People don't end up with bodies like that without undergoing very specific physical and dietary routines. It doesn't make sense to me for Skynet to pick a physical template that is substantially different from almost every single human specimen Skynet has had access to. But regardless of all that, the fact that we see two bulky Terminator models doesn't mean that leaner models couldn't exist. We were never given an in-fiction reason why less bulky Terminators couldn't be built. The assumption that all Terminators are huge is fan speculation. Between James Cameron's description of the original concept and comments made about the casting of Arnold, there's plenty of room to embrace the original concept. The casting of Arnold did not cross some point of no return.
Quote:
But we were still shown only bodybuilders
James Cameron really screwed up then by giving us the T-1000. Not only was it a lean guy instead of a bodybuilder, but it wasn't a metal skeleton with living tissue on it. You'd think the guy who wrote the story would have figured out that all Terminators should be the same. But if he's willing to throw away a two-bodybuilder trend by giving us something different, then I say embrace the idea, at least a little. Let's have more Terminators that defy the stereotype. Let's have Terminators that don't look like they have lifetime gym memberships. Lets have Terminators that can surprise the audience.
Quote:
They wouldnt be big because if we go by Skynet's reasoning theyd be slim and sexy
Skynet's reasoning has never been firmly established, and that logic completely ignores the artistic reasons behind hiring Arnold. Anyway, how sexy is a female Terminator going to be with matted hair, a dirty face, and covered in rags? It's not like they'll be wearing eyeshadow, lipstick, red nail polish, and evening gowns. Considering that one stereotype for attractive women is a thin figure, that's actually pretty consistent with what happens to people who don't eat a lot.
Quote:
It doesnt. But Skynet created men in which you can see every muscle making them too perfect. Too good
So that means that Skynet cannot learn from its mistakes? Kyle Reese's testimony in T1 establishes that Skynet has the ability and willingness to improve upon a product. All of Skynet's machines were HK's, until it added Terminators to its arsenal. Skynet's most advanced infiltrators had rubber skin, until Skynet developed living tissue. Living tissue was state-of-the-art, until Skynet developed mimetic polyalloy. Skynet ultimately created a Terminator model that could flawlessly mimic any individual down to the most minute detail. Why would Skynet be able to do that, yet be unable to make incremental improvements to lesser technology that it already created?